The SEO contest on google for the word has a habitaquo bases fully share, but I have some criticisms those bases. To understand my criticism must first understand the concept of Sandbox or sandbox. The English name quite clearly expresses the concept of sandbox.
are websites that want to run a lot of blow by adding lots of links from directories and other websites with the same text in the link, to position a website specifically to a particular search. In such cases, usually detect google and take to the web to a litter box. It is a space where progress is very difficult and every time you want to move faster you do it more slowly. In such cases the best we can do is continue to slow down and look for other keywords to google positioning. When you stop striving for that word position, google is acting like a river you along slowly towards the first position until the passage of a few days you get the position you deserve.
Much has been said about the days that google keeps you in temporary housing arena. It's actually something that in my experience varies. If once put in the Sandbox still insisting on a single keyword can take more than a year to position your web. If you've stressed a lot and let you take 6 months to recover from early position. If you have not done too much abuse with the keyword, then you can position your website once a week to be thrown into the Sandbox.
Well, clarified the concept of Sandbox know that there is a dispute about certain domains over others. The difference lies in the age of a domain . Not in the age of a web. The age of a domain is easy to find with the profits of a normal DNS. But there are sites that show what you like http://www.whois.org/
rules Google uses its positioning as if laws are treated. And these human laws usually not retroactive. This is the reason why there is something ancient domains that are not subject to the Sandbox.
If you do a contest like habitaquo, I think that one rule should be that all competitors do so in existing domains. Here comes the clarification of what it means to a domain.
For example:
www.blogger.com is a third level domain.
http://www.blogger.com/habitaquo is a page or section of that domain.
habitaquo.blogger.com is another third-level domain.
In this contest there are sites that compete with ancient domains that are not subject to the Sandbox. This enables an acceleration much than other domains. Even before they could raise the spam problem would be well positioned without necessarily spam.
Examples of what I say is:
www.lacoctelera.com / habitaquo
www.lacoctelera.com / habitaquo-x
I do not think that the webmasters of these sites are to blame. Moreover, I commend his honesty. None of the above is misusing of mind mentioned earlier.
To prove what I say you can run some commands for positioning in google to know which site is more likely to fall in the Sandbox if you fall at all. The most typical command would be:
allinanchor: "habitaquo"
And although change some positions it is also true that he who has the first position that is habitaquo-habitaquo.blogspot.com and this would be the most likely to fall if you fall Sandbox someone.
The problem is in the contest rules and not the websmaster. For the next competition I would rule that you must have a new domain or subdomain. That is, everyone would start on equal from the starting line.
In any case I am happy with the honesty, as I said before it can reach sites an advantage over others do not, though ... Will there be such?
0 comments:
Post a Comment